Abstract:
A critique of post-processual thinking, interpretation and hermeneutics, from the perspective of the theory of 'natural attitude'. Argues that post-processual archaeology is actually contained within the horizon of processualism while only feigning to be a more critical approach to the past and that it has an exaggerated and ill examined sense of the worth and utility of non-archaeologically indigenous theorising. There is a response from Julian Thomas, with a further comment from the author. Bath, Robert